EBS 2025학년도 수능특강 영어독해연습 Week6_12강 1~4번 문제들

2025학년도 수능특강 영어독해연습 Week6_12강 1~4번 문제들을 Keywords, phrases, clauses, sentences을 찾은 후 글의 내용 파악해서 문제풀이를 하겠습니다.

"When clicked, the image enlarges"

< 구: 두 단어 이상 > [ 절: 접주동 ]

구안에 절이 들어갈 수 도 절안에 구가 들어갈 수도 있다. 덩어리를 잘 묶어 보면 문장이 어렵지 않게 보이기 시작한다.

< 명사구 > [ 명사절 ] < 형용사구 > [ 형용사절 ] < 부사구 > [ 부사절 ]

 

고딕체와 밑줄만 잘 보면 답이 보인다

 

2024년 서울대 진학률이 높은 고등학교 전국 37개 학교

[문제] 1 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않은 것은? 

Because supply networks do not operate in isolation from each other, they may generate connections, synergies, and conflicts. Almond growers in Southern California, where little water is available, inevitably find themselves ① clashing with other food industries to secure water rights. The runoff of fertilizers from agricultural fields that flows into rivers and eventually to the sea may create ② sustainability issues for industries such as fish farming or fishing. However, farmers who use fertilizers to increase their yields and improve their incomes do not ③ avoid the expenses necessary to clean polluted waters. These examples show how productive factors in one supply network can easily turn into negative externalities in others. By negative externalities, economists and environmental experts mean the side effects caused by one industry that are not taken into account in determining its costs of operation, such as pollution and public health issues ④ generated by the production or consumption of certain goods. By not having to pay to take care of these side effects, an industry can keep its prices ⑤ low, transferring costs to other actors or industries that unwillingly find themselves dealing with the externalities and, often, picking up the tab.

* runoff: 유입(물), 유거수 ** externality: 외부 효과 *** pick up the tab: 비용을 지불하다

 

Content of the text: 공급망은 홀로 작동하지 않고 관계, 동반 그리고 갈등을 낳는다.

 

Tip for finding answers: The runoff of fertilizers from agricultural fields [that flows into rivers and eventually to the sea] may] create ② sustainability issues for industries such as fish farming or fishing. However, farmers [who use fertilizers to increase their yields and improve their incomes] do not ③ avoid the expenses necessary <to clean polluted waters>. These examples show [how productive factors in one supply network can easily turn into negative externalities in others]. 농업에서의 비료사용이 바다로 흘러가 양식업에 지속 가능성 문제를 발생시킬 수 있다. 그러나 농부들은 오염된 물을 정화시키기에 필요한 비용을 지불하지 않고 있다. 한 공급망의 생산적인 요소가 다른 공급망에서 부정적 외부 효과가 일어난다.

 

[문제] 2 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳은?

Recent research has suggested [that the efficiency of science exploration missions can be improved by a factor of five through the introduction of greater levels of autonomy].

 

Rovers have made important discoveries on and increased our understanding of Mars. ( ① ) However, a major obstacle to scientific exploration has been the communication link between the rover and the operations team on Earth. ( ② ) It can take as much as half an hour for sensor information to be sent from Mars to Earth and for commands to be sent from Earth to Mars. ( ③ ) In addition, guidance to rovers needs to be planned in advance because there are limited upload and download windows with Mars due to the positions of orbiters serving as information relays between the planets. ( ④ ) Human operators would still provide high-level guidance on mission objectives, but the rover would have the flexibility to select its own science targets using the most up-to-date information. ( ⑤ ) In addition, it would be desirable for rovers to respond appropriately to various hazards and system failures without human intervention.

* rover: (행성) 탐사차 ** window: (한정) 시간대, (잠깐의) 기회 *** orbiter: 궤도 선회 우주선

 

Content of the text: 화성 탐사차에 대한 자율성 부여

 

 

[문제] 3 다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?

One form of climate injustice arises from the way that scientists and other climate activists have tried to motivate personal action or policy change to reduce climate-forcing emissions. The call to action on climate is almost always sounded as an appeal to save the world from environmental disaster. This way of framing the ethical issues ignores the fact that for many poor and indigenous peoples around the world, the disaster has already occurred. They are currently involved in picking up the pieces and adapting to a world in which their traditional ways of life are no longer possible. In presenting climate justice as the attempt to avoid some future disaster, climate activists fail to recognize the plight of people who are suffering today. This is a failure of justice in recognition that ignores and even conceals injustices currently being suffered by indigenous groups. It continues a pattern of marginalization that such groups have experienced since the early days of colonization.

* indigenous: 토착의 ** plight: 곤경, 역경 *** marginalization: 소외

↓

The way scientists and climate activists portray the ethical issues of climate change as something that relates to a future disaster (A) the injustices that poor and indigenous peoples are presently experiencing, and it contributes to (B) their alienation.

            (A)                     (B)

① exaggerates  ……  minimizing

② rationalizes  ……   identifying

③ overlooks     ……   sustaining

④ exposes       ……    detecting

⑤ acknowledges …… overcoming

 

Content of the text: 기후 불평등으로 토착 집단이 겪고 있는 불평등을 무시하고 은폐하는 인식에 관한 글 내용

 

Tip for finding answers: The way [scientists and climate activists portray the ethical issues of climate change as something [that relates to a future disaster]] (A) the injustices [that poor and indigenous peoples are presently experiencing], and it contributes to (B) their alienation.

 

[문제] 4 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않은 것은?

Self-regulation should qualify almost by definition as at least a limited form of free will. That is, without self-regulation, the organism cannot help but act on the first or strongest impulse that arises in response to a situation. With self-regulation, the organism can override that response, allowing a ① different impulse or response to take over. Overriding the first response frees the person from having to respond in that particular way and, if only briefly, ② creates a gap or uncertainty that opens the door for other possibilities. This is not to say that the eventual response is necessarily ③ better than the first or that it is itself not the product of an inner causal sequence of responses. But the fact of changing away from the first to ④ enable the second should constitute a kind of freedom, and it would almost certainly be recognized as such. And humans who could ⑤ suppress that much free will, who could override one response in order to permit another, would probably survive and reproduce better than their rivals who couldn’t.

* override: 중단시키다, 무시하다

 

Content of the text: 자기 규제는 자유의지의 제한된 형태로 자격을 가져야 한다.

 

Tip for finding answers: And humans [who could ⑤ suppress that much free will], [who could override one response in order to permit another], would probably survive and reproduce better than their rivals [who couldn’t]. 자유의지를 발휘할 수 있는 사람이 그렇지 못한 경재자보다 더 잘 생존하고 번식할 것이다. 따라서 suppress를 exert로 바꾸어야 한다.